PAPER FRAMEWORK · 长图版

SSCI 论文框架示意|一篇论文从头到尾怎么搭

逐章节拆解 SSCI 论文的写作框架:每种部件有哪些写法、每种写法对应什么框架,全部图示化。先从摘要这一章讲起——摘要单独成章:先分两种类型,每种各两个框架,结构化摘要配一张细颗粒度思维导图(内嵌范文例句)。范文原文(Zhang et al. 2024 全文)已附在页首,可在线阅读与下载。

当前已完成:摘要篇 + 引言篇 + 综述篇 📄 范文原文已附 · 可在线阅读 方法 → 结论 逐块补充中 讨论用示意 · 非投稿材料
📄
范文原文 · 全文已附
A metaphor-based robot programming approach to facilitating young children's computational thinking and positive learning behaviors
Zhang, Chen, Hu, Bao, Tu & Hwang · Computers & Education(Elsevier), 2024, 215: 105039
本页各章的"范文例句"均出自这篇原文——后续章节(方法 / 结果 / 讨论)的拆解也将以它为准。原文仅供写作学习讨论,非投稿材料。
01

论文整体骨架Paper Anatomy

一篇实证类 SSCI 论文的通行结构:摘要是"全篇的缩影",放在最前、最后写。

ABSTRACT
摘要
Abstract
1
引言
Introduction
2
文献综述
Literature Review
3
方法
Method
4
结果
Results
5
讨论
Discussion
6
结论与展望
Conclusions

※ 章节划分各刊略有差异:示例论文以 4. Experimental design / 5. Results / 6. Discussion and conclusions 收尾(讨论与结论合并为末章);亦有论文在方法前单列"理论框架"章。后续章节拿到素材后按本页模式续写。

02

摘要 · 两种类型Two Kinds of Abstract

投教育 / 教育技术类 SSCI 期刊,摘要首先分两大类型——按目标期刊投稿要求二选一。每种类型下面各有两个"框架"。

① 结构化摘要

Structured Abstract · 期刊给定小标题,逐项填写
常见于 Taylor & Francis、Springer 系教育期刊
  • 框架 A:LRA 五要素链
    Background and Context → Objective → Method → Findings → Implications
  • 框架 B:期刊投稿模板图示
    背景与环境 / 目标 / 方法 / 研究发现 / 启示(中英对照按栏填写)
  • 示例:Vieira et al. (2023), Computer Science Education

② 非结构化摘要

Unstructured Abstract · 无小标题,一段成文
常见于 Elsevier 系(如 Computers & Education
  • 框架 A:四步写作逻辑链
    指出问题 → 提出方法 → 研究发现 → 提出结论
  • 框架 B:原文逐句对照读法
    整段英文摘要逐句"染色"映射到四步
  • 示例:Zhang et al. (2024), Computers & Education
03

结构化摘要Structured Abstract

期刊在投稿模板里规定好小标题,作者按栏填写。教育技术类常用 LRA 五要素格式。

框架 A | LRA 五要素逻辑链 核心框架

STEP 1
背景与环境
Background
and Context
为什么做:
现象 · 研究缺口
STEP 2
目标
Objective
做什么:
研究目的 / 问题
STEP 3
方法
Method
怎么做:
样本 · 设计 · 分析
STEP 4
研究发现
Findings
发现了什么:
主要结果
STEP 5
启示
Implications
有何用:
理论 / 实践意义

五要素环环相扣:缺口从"背景"来,目标补缺口,方法落实目标,发现回应目标,启示消化发现。

思维导图 | 五要素 · 细颗粒度拆解 内嵌范文例句

摘要单独成章,本章配一张导图:每个要素拆到「写什么要点 → 常用句式 → 范文例句」三层;范文取自右侧文献示例(Vieira et al. 2023)的原文。点击带 +/- 圆点的节点可展开 / 收起。

💡 颜色含义:墨色=要点 · 蓝色=句式 · 琥珀色=范文例句;手机上画布可左右滑动。

框架 B | 期刊投稿模板图示 长什么样

投稿系统里按栏填写——版面上就是五个加粗小标题 + 对应段落(以示例论文的内容填充示意):

📄 期刊论文首页 · Structured abstract(示意)
Background and Context 背景与环境
CT 是人人都应发展的基本素养;序列与算法思维是其核心;幼儿如何发展 CT 尚待研究。
Objective 目标
构建幼儿"序列与算法设计"的学习进阶,并识别其进阶中面临的挑战。
Method 方法
14 名 5–6 岁幼儿;不插电活动 + Bee-Bot 机器人两轮挑战;扎根理论分析。
Findings 研究发现
四种逐级进阶的解题方式:逐步执行 → 简单分解 → 高级分解 → 完整算法设计。
Implications 启示
帮助教师支持幼儿 CT 学习;打开"认知技能 × CT 活动"关系的新问题。

※ 各刊小标题措辞略有差异(如 Purpose / Design / Results / Conclusions),五格逻辑一致,投稿前以期刊 Guide for Authors 为准。

文献示例 | 五要素逐段对照原文 真实摘要

Towards a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for five- and six-year-old children engaging with an educational robot
Camilo Vieira, J. Chiu & B. Velasquez
Computer Science Education (Taylor & Francis), 2023 · DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2023.2255058
Background and Context = 背景 · 为什么做

Computational thinking (CT) is a fundamental skill and a new form of literacy that everyone should develop to participate in civic society. Sequencing and algorithmic thinking are at the core of CT. This study looked into how young children enrolled in a kindergarten in Colombia develop CT skills.

Objective = 目标 · 做什么

This paper aims to develop a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for early childhood. This goal is complemented by identifying the challenges children face to advance into more sophisticated approaches to problem-solving using algorithmic thinking.

Method = 方法 · 怎么做

Fourteen five- and six-year-old students participated in this study. These children participated in unplugged learning activities, and solved two sets of challenges with the BeeBot. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze how they solved these algorithmic thinking activities and the challenges they faced in this process.

Findings = 发现 · 得到什么

Our results suggest four increasingly sophisticated approaches to solving these activities: step-by-step, simple decomposition, advanced decomposition, and full algorithm design. We also found different challenges students faced when working on these activities. These challenges can relate to critical cognitive skills.

Implications = 启示 · 有何用

These results will enable educators to support student learning about CT. These results also open new questions about the relationship between cognitive skills and CT activities in early childhood.

04

非结构化摘要Unstructured Abstract

没有小标题、一段连贯成文——但逻辑链藏在字里行间,靠衔接词显形。同样有两个框架。

框架 A | 四步写作逻辑链 核心框架

第一步
指出问题
Problem
时代背景 + 手段
+ However 缺口
第二步
提出方法
Method
理论依据 +
Therefore 本研究
第三步
研究发现
Findings
Results revealed
结果逐条呈现
第四步
提出结论
Conclusion
Accordingly
意义与贡献

四步的"路标"是衔接词:However 点出缺口 → Therefore 引出方法 → Results revealed 呈现发现 → Accordingly 收束意义。

框架 B | 原文逐句对照(染色读法)拆一篇真摘要

A metaphor-based robot programming approach to facilitating young children's computational thinking and positive learning behaviors
Xinli Zhang, Yuchen Chen, Lailin Hu, Yiwei Bao, Yun-Fang Tu, Gwo-Jen Hwang
Computers & Education (Elsevier), 2024, 215: 105039
指出问题 提出方法 研究发现 提出结论
指出问题 · 背景

In the artificial intelligence age, cultivating young children's computational thinking (CT) has sparked tremendous attention.

指出问题 · 手段

Programmable robotics is a developmentally-appropriate and screen-free means that provides young children with great opportunities to learn programming and develop CT.

指出问题 · 缺口(However)

However, it is reported that young children might have difficulties learning abstract CT concepts.

提出方法 · 理论依据

As a helpful pedagogical facilitator, metaphors can help turn abstract concepts into more concrete and clear concepts that learners are familiar with.

提出方法 · 本研究(Therefore)

Therefore, this research proposed a metaphor-based robot programming (MRP) approach and explored its impact on young children's CT and behavioral patterns.

提出方法 · 实验设计

A total of 118 children aged 5–6 were recruited in this experiment with two conditions: the experimental group adopted the metaphor-based robot programming (MRP) approach while the control group used the conventional robot programming (CRP) approach.

研究发现 · 结果一

Results revealed that children who adopted the MRP approach outperformed children who adopted the CRP approach on CT.

研究发现 · 结果二

In addition, behavioral analysis indicated that the proposed MRP approach could facilitate children's superior learning performance and more positive learning behaviors, so as to help them achieve learning objectives.

提出结论(Accordingly)

Accordingly, this study can provide insightful guidance and inspiration for future research on effective programming teaching and CT development for young children.

※ 一段 9 句 = 四步:3 句铺问题(含 1 句转折点缺口)、3 句给方法、2 句报结果、1 句收意义。比例可作写作参照。

两种摘要 · 底层逻辑对照 一张表看懂

维度结构化摘要非结构化摘要
外观期刊给定小标题,逐项分段无小标题,一段连贯成文
框架LRA 五要素(显性标签)四步逻辑链(隐性衔接词)
逻辑对应Background → Objective → Method → Findings → Implications指出问题 → 提出方法 → 研究发现 → 提出结论
显形路标小标题本身就是路标However / Therefore / Results revealed / Accordingly
典型期刊Computer Science Education(T&F)等Computers & Education(Elsevier)等
共同本质缺口 → 目的 → 方法 → 发现 → 意义(两种摘要只是"显性 / 隐性"表达之别)

摘要写作要点 速查

结构化怎么写
  • 严格照抄期刊小标题,不增不删
  • 每要素 1–3 句,全文约 150–250 词
  • Findings 写具体结果,不写"进行了讨论"
  • 写作顺序 ≠ 阅读顺序:Background 常最后写
非结构化怎么写
  • 按"问题 → 方法 → 发现 → 结论"四步排句序
  • 每步用衔接词显形:However / Therefore / Results revealed / Accordingly
  • 首句点大背景,末句给意义,中间不绕
  • 数字进摘要:样本量、组别、关键效应要出现
05

引言Introduction

引言回答"为什么做这个研究":从大背景出发像漏斗一样逐层收窄,最后落到研究问题。示例:Zhang et al. 2024(MRP vs CRP 那篇)的引言可拆成三段九步

框架 A | 三段九步漏斗逻辑链 核心框架

第一段 · 铺背景WHY this field | 由宽到窄圈定领域
① 背景因素领域为什么重要:幼儿期是关键阶段(Piaget)+ CT 已纳入多国 K-12 课程
② 导出研究主题从"CT 重要"推出"用什么培养 CT":编程 → 教育机器人,一步比一步具体
③ 相关研究摆已有工作:可编程机器人教儿童编程、发展 CT 已被验证有效
第二段 · 指缺口WHY not yet | 已有研究还差什么
④ 过去研究的问题传统机器人编程教学直接教抽象概念,幼儿难以结合具体经验,算法/序列/循环/调试掌握困难——缺适龄方法
⑤ 解决思路的尝试概念隐喻理论(CMT):用具体经验域理解抽象域;已在大学生→高中生→小学生逐级验证,幼儿是空白
⑥ 依然存在的问题收口成一句明确的 gap:隐喻对幼儿 CT 的影响尚未被讨论
第三段 · 提目的与问题WHAT this study does | 本研究做什么
⑦ 导出目的一把隐喻整合进机器人编程 → 提出 MRP 方法开发幼儿 CT(对应 RQ1)
⑧ 行为线小循环第二轮"尝试 → 问题 → 方法":学习行为很重要但幼儿研究少 → 本研究再看行为模式(对应 RQ2)
⑨ 提出研究问题目的落成可检验的 RQ:RQ1 问 CT(认知结果),RQ2 问积极学习行为(过程行为)

关键规律:「问题 → 尝试 → 仍存问题 → 目的」这个循环在引言里跑了两轮——CT 线落到目的⑦(RQ1),学习行为线落到⑧⑨(RQ2)。多研究问题的论文,就是一个缺口配一个目的、一问对一果。

思维导图 | 九步 · 细颗粒度拆解 内嵌范文例句

每步拆到「要点 → 范文例句」两层;例句取自下方范文(Zhang et al. 2024 引言原文 · 中译)。颜色区分三段:墨绿=铺背景 · 橙=指缺口 · 深蓝=提目的。点击带 +/- 圆点的节点可展开 / 收起。

💡 手机上画布可左右滑动。

框架 B | 范文全文逐段对照 真实引言

引言原文(节选中译 · 按九步标注)
Zhang et al., 2024 · Computers & Education(Elsevier)
即"非结构化摘要"章同篇范文:隐喻机器人编程(MRP) vs 传统机器人编程(CRP)
① 背景因素 = 漏斗第①步 · 铺背景

在全球范围内,CT 已经被纳入美国、英国、芬兰、中国和其他国家的 K-12 课程。最近的工作已经证实,早期接触 CT 可以预测 STEM 学科学习、执行功能、21 世纪能力,甚至未来的职业道路。由于幼儿期是儿童成长和学习的关键阶段(Piaget),培养幼儿 CT 是必不可少的。

② 导出研究主题 = 漏斗第②步 · 铺背景

编程已经被认为是促进学习者 CT 学习的首要和最有效的手段。在机器人技术不断进步的今天,教育机器人越来越多地应用于(幼儿教育场景)。

③ 相关研究 = 漏斗第③步 · 铺背景

近年来,研究者使用可编程机器人来教儿童编程,并在发展儿童 CT 方面验证了其有效性。

④ 过去研究的问题 = 漏斗第④步 · 指缺口

在早期儿童教育中,传统的机器人编程教学通常采用直接介绍(抽象概念)的方式:教师主要集中于介绍抽象的 CT 概念和编程指令,然后鼓励儿童编写自己的程序,而没有提供指导策略来帮助他们将抽象的 CT 概念和已经熟悉的具体概念结合起来。因此,幼儿通常在掌握算法/序列、表示、循环和调试等抽象概念方面存在挑战。按照皮亚杰的理论,2–7 岁幼儿依赖具体经验;建构主义学习迁移也要求将现有经验与目标抽象概念联系起来。上述问题可能源于缺乏适当的、适合年龄的幼儿机器人编程教学方法。

⑤ 理论融入的尝试 = 漏斗第⑤步 · 指缺口

概念隐喻理论(CMT)指出,隐喻允许个体在相对抽象的经验领域与具体经验领域之间建立联系。在教育领域,隐喻可以作为一种有效的工具,让教师用与学习者经验相关的、更加具体的概念来解释抽象概念,帮助他们更直观地理解目标概念。以往研究已证实隐喻在语言、数学和生物等学科(教学)中的作用;(相关尝试)已覆盖大学生、高中生和小学生——隐喻机器人对促进小学四至六年级学生 CT 的(有效性)已被验证,对幼儿 CT 有很大的潜力。

⑥ 依然存在的问题 = 漏斗第⑥步 · 指缺口

然而,机器人编程学习中的隐喻对幼儿 CT 的影响尚未得到讨论。

⑦ 导出目的一 = 漏斗第⑦步 · 提目的

考虑到这一局限性,本研究试图将隐喻整合到机器人编程中,提出一种基于隐喻的机器人编程(MRP)方法来开发幼儿 CT。

⑧ 行为线的尝试 · 问题 · 方法 = 漏斗第⑧步 · 提目的

(Bers 等)强调了(技术增强学习环境中)学习行为的重要性,特别是在机器人编程学习中:在不同教学方法下,儿童往往表现出不同的学习行为;分析和比较儿童的学习行为,不仅可以为评估教学方法的有效性提供定性数据,还可为教育研究者制定更有效的教学策略提供参考。然而,目前关于幼儿在编程学习中的学习行为的研究较少。因此,本研究进一步探讨了 MRP 方法对幼儿行为模式的影响,并假设采用 MRP 的儿童可以更好地提高 CT,并表现出更积极的学习行为。

⑨ 提出研究问题 = 漏斗第⑨步 · 提目的

本研究的主要研究问题如下:(1) MRP 方法是否比传统的机器人编程(CRP)方法更好地促进幼儿 CT?(2) MRP 方法是否比 CRP 方法更能促进幼儿的积极学习行为?

※ 括号内为原文省略处的补足示意;引文据讲义中译整理,投稿引用请回核原文。

06

文献综述Literature Review

综述回答"别人做到哪了、还差什么":不是资料堆砌,而是把引言里点的缺口用文献论证一遍。范文(Zhang et al. 2024)的综述 = 三小节递进,每节内部各跑一条"小漏斗"。

框架 A | 三块基石递进 + 节内小漏斗 核心框架

2.1 幼儿的计算思维WHAT · 是什么:概念与重要性
① 概念由来Papert 1980《Mindstorms》+LOGO 语言首提 CT
② 明确定义Wing 2006 显性定义并推广:与读写算同等重要
③ 框架具体化Brennan & Resnick 三维框架;Bers 七个强大理念(幼儿版)
④ 证据共识问题解决本质获公认;早期 CT 关联 STEM / 执行功能 / 21 世纪能力
⑤ 收口 ▸幼儿期=发展关键期(Piaget)→ 培养幼儿 CT 应高度重视
2.2 机器人编程与幼儿 CTWITH WHAT · 用什么教:工具与现状
① 手段定位编程=促进 CT 最有效的手段(多研究共识)
② 工具兴起教育机器人兴起;"低门槛(low floor)"适龄设计
③ 独特优势无屏:护视力+降认知负荷 × 有形互动的游戏化情境
④ 研究证据KIBO / Matatalab 实证:适龄且有效,还能促积极行为
⑤ 教学法现状Coding as a Playground 等已有探索;主流仍是"讲述式"
⑥ 收口 ▸抽象概念仍难+前运算阶段依赖具体经验 → 缺适龄教学法
2.3 隐喻HOW · 怎么教得更好:理论依据
① 理论 CMT概念隐喻理论:源域(具体熟悉)→ 目标域(抽象)
② 教育价值把抽象概念接到儿童的生活经验上;隐喻须贴近日常
③ 学科验证语言 / 数学 / 化学等学科教学已证实有效
④ 编程应用大学生(Java)、小学 4–6 年级(Scratch)已用;幼儿=空白
⑤ 收口 ▸隐喻适龄潜力大 → 本研究把隐喻融入机器人编程

咬合规律:三块基石按「是什么 → 用什么教 → 怎么教得更好」递进;每节末尾的"收口议题"把读者推向下一节——2.2 收口的"缺适龄教学法"正好由 2.3 的"隐喻"接住,2.3 收口的"幼儿未验证"就是引言 gap 的文献论证。整章综述=把引言的漏斗在文献层面重走一遍。

思维导图 | 三小节 · 细颗粒度拆解 内嵌范文例句

每小节拆到「步骤 → 要点 / 范文例句」;例句为范文英文原文节选(可当句式模板用)。颜色区分三块基石:墨绿=2.1 计算思维 · 深蓝=2.2 机器人编程 · 橙=2.3 隐喻;叶子中墨色=要点、琥珀色=范文例句。默认收起到步骤,点节点或"全部展开"看例句。

💡 手机上画布可左右滑动。

框架 B | 范文逐段对照 真实综述 · 英文原文

文献综述原文(节选 · 按步骤标注)
Zhang et al., 2024 · Computers & Education(Elsevier)· Section 2
即页首"范文原文"的 2.1–2.3 三小节;以下引文有删节,完整全文点页首在线阅读
2.1 ① 概念由来 → ② 明确定义 = 概念史两步走

Papert (1980) first introduced CT in his book, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. He developed the LOGO programming language and discussed the challenge of incorporating computer science education into a playful setting to improve children's problem-solving skills. Later, Wing (2006) first explicitly defined the term CT and popularized it. She emphasized the significance of CT for children and stated that it is as important as reading, writing, and arithmetic.

2.1 ③ 框架具体化 = 定义如何落地

Moreover, several attempts have made CT more specific. For example, Brennan and Resnick (2012) divided CT into a three-dimensional framework consisting of CT concepts, CT practices, and CT perspectives. Bers (2018) concentrated on young children's CT and proposed seven powerful ideas: hardware/software, algorithm, representation, debugging, modularity, control structure, and design process. Despite the numerous different definitions of CT, the problem-solving nature of CT in technological and real-world problems has gained widespread recognition.

2.1 ④ 证据与重视 → ⑤ 收口 = 升温 + 应高度重视

In recent years, cultivating young children's CT has sparked increasing attention. Recent works have shown that early-year CT education is associated with STEM subject learning, executive functions, 21st-century competencies, and even future career paths. … Early childhood is a critical period for children's development and learning (Piaget, 1971); therefore, cultivating young children's CT should be highly emphasized.

2.2 ① 手段定位 → ② 工具兴起 → ③ 独特优势 = 为什么是机器人

In recent years, several studies have verified that programming is the most effective means to promote learners' CT. … Programmable robotics was designed as a developmental-appropriate tool to teach children programming and develop their CT. … robot programming tends to be designed according to the principle of a low floor (the ability for children to program without professional training). Compared with screen-based programming, robot programming can not only protect children's visual health but also reduce their cognitive load. More importantly, robot programming provides young children with great opportunities to interact with tangible objects in a playful learning context to foster their CT.

2.2 ④ 研究证据 = 实证支持

Research has identified the applicability and positive benefits of robot programming in developing CT for young children. For example, Bers et al. (2019) confirmed that children could achieve high-level CT through the KIBO robotic kit. Fu et al. (2023) and Yang et al. (2022) revealed the positive benefits of Matatalab robot programming to early-year children's CT. … As such, robot programming can be an age-appropriate and effective means to promote young children's CT and positive learning behaviors.

2.2 ⑤ 教学法现状 = 别人怎么教

Bers (2019) proposed a "Coding as Another Language" approach for early childhood computer science … In addition, Bers et al. (2019) proposed a "Coding as a playground" approach for teaching children programming … Moreover, according to the review work of Bakala et al. (2021) and Macrides et al. (2022), most studies used a narrative approach in robot programming education.

2.2 ⑥ 收口议题 = 问题 + 阶段归因

However, young children still have challenges in grasping some abstract CT concepts, such as algorithms, loops, and debugging. … This problem has not yet been well addressed in previous research. Relkin et al. (2021) mentioned that the stage of children's development can constrain the acquisition of CT. Piaget's (1971) developmental stages proposed that young children are primarily in the preoperational stage … their conceptual knowledge constructions are dependent on more concrete and familiar experiences. … As such, there is a further need to propose an age-appropriate pedagogical approach to teach young children robot programming and develop their CT.

2.3 ① 理论 CMT → ② 经典示例 = 理论界定

The conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) indicates that conceptual metaphors are employed in everyday life and play a crucial role in an individual's thinking process. Metaphors allow learners to make connections between relatively abstract areas of experience (target domains) with more concrete experiences we are familiar with (source domains). … For example, in the sayings "life is a journey" and "life is a play," the "journey" and "play" metaphors were used to help learners better understand the different interpretations of abstract "life" concepts.

2.3 ③ 教育价值 → ④ 多学科验证 = 为什么能用于教学

In educational fields, metaphors can be an effective facilitator to connect abstract concepts into concrete and familiar concepts that are relevant to students' life and learning experiences. … the selection of metaphors should closely link with the learner's daily life contexts or learning knowledge that has already been well understood. Until now, several researchers have used and validated the effectiveness of metaphors in a variety of subject teachings, such as language, mathematics, and chemistry.

2.3 ⑤ 编程教学应用 = 已有人怎么用

In addition, metaphors have been applied to teach programming. Milner (2010) conducted a study using the EventListener metaphor in programming teaching and verified its effectiveness in helping college students understand the mechanism of Java event handling. Pérez-Marín (2018) proposed a methodology proposal based on metaphors to teach children basic CT concepts, such as a recipe as a program and sequence, a pantry as the memory, and boxes as variables. In addition, Pérez-Marin et al. (2020) further validated its effectiveness in developing CT for primary school students from fourth to sixth grades based on the Scratch programming environment. However, this study lacked a control group to make a comparison with the metaphor-based programming teaching.

2.3 ⑥ 收口 → 本研究 = 落回 gap 与本研究

As we can see, metaphors can be an age-appropriate approach for programming learning, which can connect abstract CT concepts into concrete and familiar concepts that are relevant to children's life and learning experiences. … To date, metaphors have been used in programming teaching to enhance older age groups' CT (e.g., college students and primary school students), while the applicability of metaphors in programming teaching for developing early-year children's CT has not yet been discussed. Therefore, this study integrated metaphors into robot programming learning and proposed a metaphor-based robot programming approach to developing young children's CT.

※ 引文出自 Word 原稿、为阅读顺畅有删节(… 处略),引用请以刊出版为准。

综述写作要点 速查

三小节怎么排
  • 按"是什么 → 用什么 → 怎么更好"递进,各节一个概念主线
  • 节内小漏斗:概念由来 → 定义/框架 → 证据 → 收口议题
  • 只收与本研究相关的文献,无关领域一概不进综述
收口怎么写
  • 每节末尾留一个"未解决":… has not yet been discussed / well addressed
  • 上一节的收口=下一节的入场券,环环咬合
  • 末节收口直接写出 "Therefore, this study …",与引言目的句呼应
07

后续章节路线图Roadmap

本页按"一块一块"补全——摘要篇、引言篇、综述篇已上线,以下章节拿到素材后按同样的"框架 + 思维导图 + 真实文献示例"模式续写。

1 引言 Introduction

已完成:三段九步漏斗 + 导图 + 范文对照

2 文献综述 Literature Review

已完成:三块基石漏斗 + 导图 + 范文对照

🧪

3 方法 Method

待补充

📊

4 结果 Results

待补充

💬

5 讨论 Discussion

待补充

🏁

6 结论 Conclusions

待补充

📮

投稿配套:Highlights / Cover Letter / Response Letter

待补充 · 摘要之外的常见投稿材料